Posts

Showing posts from 2009

2009, The Year in VC, so far

Image
Venture Capital Investment Summary for Q1 + Q2 2009, the stats so far: 2009 funds invested increased overall, but currently at pre-DotCom levels Total of $7 billion in first half of 2009 in over 1200 deals Spike in Seed & Early Stage Investments Highest percentage from Life Science Investment CleanTech still strong and growing stronger spurred by political and social impetus International investing on the rise as Globalism lessens geographic disparity Sources: PwC/NVCA MoneyTree™ Report based on data from Thomson Reuters Deloitte: Global Trends in Venture Capital 2009 Global Report

Facebook to Face Facts?: The Monetization of Eyeballs

Image
Facebook has the greatest blessing and curse of a Web 2.0 company - a skyrocketing and captured community of eyeballs but no strategy to monetize it. While there is no clear answer, I strongly believe there are some critical signposts that might lead us in the right direction to understand how Facebook can monetize its constituency. It took Google several years of providing a revolutionary search service and gaining a monumental following before it created AdWords which resulted in $10Bn per year revenue. Facebook has been striving for a similarly suitable model but has been wasting time with traditional banner ads that undermine its next-gen potential, until now . The next evolutionary step of a more dynamic ad-based system known at Engagement Ads ( engagement marketing ) is a unique convergence of social networking, advertising & market research. The purpose of these ads is to use video, polls and other interactive media to direct visitors to a specific Facebook Page. The

Video Games ARE the Video Games of the Future!

Image
No doubt, it is a hot, hot market and apparently somewhat recession proof. Video Games and, by extension, Virtual Entertainment(basically a game but based on a paradigm of experience rather than score/achievement) are a huge market with a worldwide projected value of $47Bn by 2010 under a CAGR of 14%(PwC, 2008). Great potential and a huge area for VCs to invest in. In 2008, funding alone for games & virtual worlds reached almost $1Bn from Venture & Angel sources which went into a approximately 110 firms(VentureBeat, April 26th 2009). With that in mind, it is a good market for any VC to be aware of so here are some thoughts about innovations that might make for good investments: Mobile Gaming / Wireless - not wireless game controllers, but actual wireless/mobile game versions that can be ported over to PDA/Cell device so that people can continue to play while on the subway or training to work or breaking for lunch. Packet or "chapter" technology that can allow for peo

Thoughts on the Facebook Interface

I was discussing the uses of social media for businesses recently with a VC contact of mine in NYC. A by-product from the disconnect that exists between social and business media, I feel there is a missing piece of the puzzle here that Facebook could crack and establish a more direct stream of revenue. Facebook is a person-centric platform in which a user's profile or "Face" is the brand which is the whole point of social networking. This differs from the MySpace strategy which simply allows homepages to be built around a business presence and allows almost complete customization. Facebook limits the changes but benefits from the user-defined & private network experience while still allowing a person to become a fan. What Facebook does not allow is the creation of actual facebook profile or homepages for a business (eg a company does not have a "face"). To this end, Facebook allows Pages or News Feeds or Events to be created as secondary tiers for a person&#

Assessing Management: How techie are the techs?

Image
It is a common and fairly dependable maxim within the VC industry to rate the probable success of a new tech firm (or any firm) by the quality of the management in place. This also extends to the quality, experience and knowledge of the technical leads at any firm whose competitive advantage relies on their in-house technology. It is rarely an issue of how many types of code does the lead developer know or how many SDLC (Software Development Life Cycle) models does the team use. Rather, it is more of a measurement of the entire team in terms of a number of factors. These factors include relevant experience, experience within the specific industry & experience within the company itself (familiarity with the product in question). These three axes are a decent, back-of-the-envelope rating system to get a firm grip on how a companies technical leads can be assessed. Included is a very simple chart I included for a VC client of mine who wanted a general, objective summary of the techno

Mobile Web: The Holy Grail of Technology

Image
Yes, the Templar's treasure of the technology age: A Mobile Web that works!  This is legendary myth spoken about by Ad-Venture Capitalists hoping to discover the proprietary mobile software platform that can provide this. This the perpetual underlying goal that all the big smartphone/PDAs such at the iPhone, the Blackberry Storm, the G1 Android, etc are trying to give their users. If you build it, they will come - come and sign up for mandatory 3-year contracts, no less. From the technologist perspective their are several hurdles that need to be overcome or addressed in order to make this a reality and give freedom to the Internet Kingdom. I have done some significant technology due diligence in this sector from research to direct company vetting. In order for a firm to be a good VC investment it should include or address some of the following issues: Mobile Web Highlights for VC Investment: Standardization : W3C Web Initiative is wrestling with this but a unification of mobi platf

The 3-Tiered Architecture and What it Means to VCs

Image
I have been asked by multiple VC clients of mine to explain the 3-Tier architecture as it pertains to vetting a software company. Since many SaaS, ASP & web-enabled software companies use an interation of this architecture it helps to have a breakdown of it. Understanding the workings of the standard 3-Tier web architecture greatly improves the VCs understanding of a web-enabled software's inner workings thus allowing for a better investment decision. The following describes the each of the layers and a standard diagram is provided to represent each conceptual tier: Presentation tier – web application layer consisting of web site code hosted on a Internet facing server (Apache or IIS). Interactions with this layer initiate data transaction calls to communicate with a runtime engine or similar in the COM layer. Logic tier – Often called the COM layer, it consists of a runtime engine or other processing central code. This layer accepts transaction calls from the presentation la